Die Grabbezirke der Eckterrasse im Kerameikos: Wurden sie tatsächlich alle Opfer von Steinraub?

https://doi.org/10.34780/m0v10a29

Autor/innen

Abstract

It has traditionally been assumed that all the grave precincts of the Corner Terrace in the Kerameikos necropolis were dismantled in 338 B.C., when Athens was facing the Macedonian invasion. Consequently, all intact precincts have been considered to postdate this event. This study demonstrates that certain precincts of the Corner Terrace did indeed lose their façades around 340 B.C. One precinct was clearly rebuilt, providing a valuable case study of what a reconstructed peribolos might have looked like. In contrast, such changes are less evident in other periboloi. A detailed analysis of the wall structures reveals sound reasons for re-evaluating the prevailing hypothesis. The connections between precincts, as well as building measures at the bases of grave monuments, are examined to show that these modifications were likely motivated by a growing desire for large monuments, rather than by stone robbery or reconstruction efforts. The possibility of stone robbery is also considered in relation to the adjacent Precinct of the Messenians. Finally, the interpretation of its archaeological remains as evidence of grave reopening is challenged. Instead, these remains may more plausibly reflect offerings made on a special occasion.

Schlagwörter

Kerameikos, Nekropole, Peribolos, Grabarchitektur, Steinraub

Veröffentlicht

2026-05-12

Ausgabe

Rubrik

Artikel

Zitationsvorschlag

Neumann, E.-A. (2026). Die Grabbezirke der Eckterrasse im Kerameikos: Wurden sie tatsächlich alle Opfer von Steinraub?. Athenische Mitteilungen, 138, 129–163. https://doi.org/10.34780/m0v10a29